Taimoor Rana is seasoned criminal defense attorney specializing in DUI related cases. He shares his expert legal opinion here Top Ten Drunkest Cities In United States »
1
- The list of top ten drunkest cities in America has been released. This list is compiled by various available DUI/DWI statistics, alcohol related car accidents, and breath rates from alcoholic live disease.
In the top ten, California and Arizona cities are cracked to top. Number one city on list is Fresno, California. California is having several cities in top ten list. But in the list there is no city of northeast states which are having trouble with alcohol.
Here is the list of top ten drunkest cities in United States:
-
Fresno, California
-
Reno, Nevada
-
Billings, Montana
-
Riverside, California Click here to read more »
You might also like
 |
 |
 |
 |
Ohio Woman Charged with 7th DUI After Injuring Three in Accident »
A woman in Ohio just received her 7th DUI, as she rammed her truck into the back of a stopped car, and injured three victims. Fortunately, the injuries of the three people in the car were not life threatening, but much worse could have happened.
The worst part is that she still has her license and thus the possibility of more accidents is still there. It’s a mockery of justice when someone so irresponsible is able to keep driving and putting people at risk. This accident signifies the fact that this woman should not be given the right to have a license.
The woman, Stephanie Foy, has already had six convictions on her record, before she was charged with the seventh one. A press release by Newsnet5 stated that Foy has been fined, placed behind bars, and even had her license suspended in the past due to infractions.
You might also like
 |
 |
 |
 |
DUI and Driving With a Suspended License Charges Should Be Taken as Different. »
It common for a driver to be caught while driving under the influence (DUI) of drugs or alcohol (generally described as DWI, DUI or drunk driving) and at the same time driving while having suspended license or recently reissued license, or DWLS, in Florida. In such cases the lawyer will have to file two charges in the information, one for driving with suspended license (DWLS) and one for DUI. Both of these charges are served in separate while defendant take these to court for trial. It also mean that the jury that take trial for DUI case will not hear the case or judge the case related to the driving with a suspended license (DWLS). For each case jury will be different for hearing.
It is because of the reason that charges of one case are different with the other. As the evidence related to driver suspended license, such as his driving history, have not concern with evidence related to DUI.
You might also like
 |
 |
 |
 |
Police Officer Must Take Care in Taking Breath Test to Avoid Driver’s License Suspension overturned »
During the investigation, the officer takes the breath test of the driver who is charged for the DUI case. The officer conducts the breath test of the driver, when the driver submits the test there are certain rules that officer must follow. When the driver is accused due to alcohol reason in Florida, the Department of Highway Safety and Vehicles directly suspends the driver’s license.
Any how the driver has the right to defense for DMV license suspension by a formal hearing in which the lawyer raises voice favoring the driver on the legal points like the stop of the driver was legal, the reason to arrest the driver was correct and that the breath test was valid. These are the points on which the lawyer speaks on behalf of the driver.
You might also like
 |
 |
 |
 |
“The Death Penalty for DUI” Is it Justified? »
Yes, here I am talking about the death penalty. In a drunk driving case. Here in United States. For murder…… No, that is not for an involuntary manslaughter. Not for vehicular homicide. Murder. And that is a first-degree murder. Likewise someone has pointed a gun at someone and pulled the trigger. MADD has achieved so much success in their political pressure campaigns that they’ve actually gotten some courts and legislatures to create a new type of crime which is referred to as “DUI murder”.
Just hold on for a minute, you say. I thought if you want to kill a person then you had to intend to kill him or her. You have to "premeditate" and such kinds of other things, right? Well, yes and no. Of course, each state is a little different, but most od the states follow similar laws. And by those laws generally a homicide ("the killing of another human being") has been broken into different categories. The first one is excusable homicide that is such a homicide where, due to the self-defense or other justification, the death is not considered as a crime. Next one is "manslaughter" — basically, which is considered as a killing but that is not murder. Usually there are two kinds of manslaughter: voluntary and involuntary.
Voluntary manslaughter is sometimes referred to as a killing in the "heat of passion"; means that you lacked the time or ability to reflect on the act.
You might also like
 |
 |
 |
 |
DUI Sobriety Checkpoints: Are they Unconstitutional? »
It is clearly said by the Constitution of the United States that the police can not just stop someone and they are not allowed to conduct an investigation unless there are “articulable facts” that are indicating possible criminal activity.
So here there is a question that how can they do exactly that with DUI roadblocks? so it is a good question. And this question was raised in the case of Michigan v. Sitz (496 U.S. 444), in which a decision of the Michigan Supreme Court striking down drunk driving roadblocks as unconstitutional had been reviewed by The U.S. Supreme Court. In a 6-3 decision, the Michigan court was reversed by the Court, holding that roadblocks were consitutionally permissible. Chief Justice Rehnquist started his majority opinion by accepting that DUI roadblocks i.e. “sobriety checkpoints” do, in reality, constitute a “seizure” which is within the language of the 4th Amendment. Explaining this in other words, yes, it’s an intentional violation of the Constitution.
You might also like
 |
 |
 |
 |
Approach a Lawyer Quickly in a DUI Arrest »
REQUEST TO TALK TO A LAWYER AS SOON AS POSSIBLE! It’s your right to talk to a lawyer, and to get a lawyer there during interrogation. If you can’t afford an attorney, one will be provided to you.”
If you’re held and taken into detention on DUI – Drunk Driving accusations by San Diego police, your right to talk to an attorney won’t be given until AFTER you present yourself to the required chemical examines performed at the Police Station or any medical facility where you have been transferred. Failure to put forward to a blood or breath alcohol examination, or “chemical test refusal”, once in detention, will impose penalty of an automatic forfeiture which means suspension of your driving license as stated by California’s “implied consent” laws.
You might also like
 |
 |
 |
 |
Be Patient While Recording DUI Statement »
USE THIS RIGHT! DO NOT GIVE EXTRA INFORMATION WHICH CAN BE PUT AGAINST YOU! It is wise to refrain from replying any question or telling things that doesn’t relate to your personal identity like name, date of birth, address or your car registration, car insurance, and driving license because this is the only information which law demands from you to give to detaining police officers or to authorities involved in your arrest, chemical examination, or imprisonment.
Yes, California laws DO demand from you to provide identification, verify your present address, and show the documents like your vehicle registration, car insurance, and license…but not anything beyond IT!
Use your right to keep silent because anything you state except what has been asked by law can inevitably be taken against you as evidence if you’re charged with DUI. The little you speak, the better it is.
You might also like
 |
 |
 |
 |
DUI Checks, Asking Reasons is Your Right »
You have the right to argue if there is not any reasonable or serious ground for police checks
Your activities must justify strong reason for suspicion of DUI on road. In a California DUI, the detaining police officer requires to describe and confirm major observations or grounds to take out you over for DUI. 
When evidencing in California DUI Jury Trials, San Diego police officers normally tell they noticed the DUI -DWI suspect racing, driving too tardily, doing dangerous or fickle lane shifts and unlawful or excessively big turns, sharp and jerking breaks, lurching, tailgating, driving the wrong path like opposite on one way streets or in opposing traffic lanes, cutting, lane straddling, and making narrow escapes to serious accidents or any other road risk which can probably cause for the traffic stop.
You might also like
|
|
 |
 |
|
FAQs about San Diego Drunk Driving »
When San Diego police arrested me for DUI, they took over my driving license. How can I have it back?
In normal cases, an expert San Diego DUI attorney can help you in showing to DMV Officials there was no solid ground for your license suspension or annulment, and it can be returned to you. If you don’t call for an “admin per se” hearing with the DMV within 10 days after your drunk driving arrest, the DMV will give back your driving license at the ending of the suspension term ( i.e. four months if this is your first case), provided you give a 125-USD which is a re-issuance fee and show insurance documents. The reissue fee is 100-USD if you were under 21 when you got arrested for DUI according too San Diego’s Zero Tolerance Law for driving under the influence.
What is the difference between the DMV driving license suspension or cancellation for DUI arrest and the driving license suspension or cancellation brought down by the judge of criminal court during hearing?
The DMV driving license suspension or cancellation received at a DUI arrest is an administrative and civil thing whereas the suspension or cancellation as a result of a conviction in criminal court becomes a criminal penalty.
You might also like
|
|
 |
 |
 |
